Radical Leftist Hate Group MSNBC Gets Caught Again

Sarah Palin is driving the lamestream media absolutely bonkers. And they’re looking for any angle they can find to take her down. On this bus tour, beyond what’s reported in the above link, ABC decided to go after “how much is this costing” and Mama Grizzly fired back, powerfully.

When asked, twice, how much her “One Nation Tour” has cost four days into the trip, she got visibly irritated.

“Check SarahPAC.com,” she said. “I don’t know why in the world you would ask a question like that. I’m just thinking about America and our foundations and our freedoms and our opportunities. Why would you ask something …”

ABC News pointed out that she often talks about the economy and how much money we’re spending.

“What does our economy have to do with how much we’re — I’m not asking you to pay for a penny of this trip,” she said.

MSNBC, that radical left-wing fake media outlet who had to throw out the spittle-flecked radical leftist Keith Olbermann and suspend the spittle-flecked radical leftist misogynist Ed Schultz, overdid it yet again with the spittle-flecked radical leftist Martin Bashir. Because Sarah Palin decided to put a flag on her bus and that’s illegal or something. Watch as Martin Bashir spews his bile and gets caught with his pants down at the same time.

SarahCuda is living rent-free in their heads. By now, she doesn’t even have to try to make them look like hyper-partisan idiots. They do all the work for her.

More popcorn, please.
________
Cross-Post

25 Comments

  1. Former Governor Palin said:

    I’m not asking you to pay for a penny of this trip.

    Gosh, a politician who understands the difference between public and private spending. That, in itself, raises her a notch in my estimation.

  2. Gosh, a politician who understands the difference between public and private spending. That, in itself, raises her a notch in my estimation.

    And she gets a pass on “soaking the rich” by levying a windfall profits tax on domestic oil production because…?

  3. “What does our economy have to do with how much we’re — I’m not asking you to pay for a penny of this trip,” she said.

    Sure she is! The first thing that pops up on her website is a plea for donations to SarahPAC.

  4. There you go again, mike. She didn’t ask ABC for a penny, and you know it. But you’d be nowhere without your dishonest hate-filled leftist talking points.

  5. When did I say she was asking ABC for money? That’s a pretty stupid suggestion, John. Heh…why would she ask a cameraman for money? I’m saying that the first thing she does when you visit her website is ask for money. Are you saying that isn’t true?

  6. Great, Pho. Some nonentity who’s jealous of Palin because people love her and nobody likes him. Yawn.

  7. mike g, she was talking to an ABC scribe. Reading comprehension isn’t your thing, is it? You were being pretty stupid in your suggesting that what she said was false because the truth doesn’t fit your leftist meme.

  8. It’s SIMPLE. No, as in Not, as in Naught are any of the TAXPAYERS money are paying for this trip. What is so hard to understand?

  9. Here is my prediction about Sarah Palin:

    She is interested in running for President, in 2016/2020!

    She is interested in running for VP again, in 2012. She will then have the support of TEA Baggers and other right wingnut extremists.

    If the Repubs are smart, they will then nominate for President a non TEA Bagger, more moderate Repub who is both competent and can attract independents. I can see Pawlenty or Danials, both competent governors from the mid-west. Petreaus would be a very strong vote getter, and a very competent leader, another Ike of sorts, but would he want to leave the CIA?

    Why would I, an Obama supporter, even tell you this? Because the nation is well served by having two competent Presidential candidates compete. Palin, well the competence is not there, never will be, but from the Repub point of view, she is a cheerleader and a strong vote getter. Perish the thought of her ever becoming President, by succession or by election – there’s the danger!

  10. So the left has MSNBC and the right has FOX. Centrists have PBS and NPR. One of the prblems I see is, there aren’t enough people listening to either one of the latter.

  11. Yes, since the people who actually made PBS and NPR successful entities plainly said they marketed it directly for the Liberal Elite niche and that’s where they live, that makes them “not Liberal Elite” or something. PBS and NPR are decidedly Liberal Elite.

    And before Perry comes around with his wildly dishonest “citation please” bovine byproduct, I have already written an article discussing this very thing and posted it here on CSPT, with sourcing and quoting. But that’s never why Perry comes around with his wildly dishonest “citation please” crap. It’s all a ruse to avoid facing the truth.

  12. Yes, since the people who actually made PBS and NPR successful entities plainly said they marketed it directly for the Liberal Elite niche

    That’s interesting – because Fox has said in court that they market to ignorant dupes who are too stupid to know they’re being lied to.

  13. Actually, Pho, you very well know that is not what FOX said

    “The court did not dispute the heart of Akre’s claim, that Fox pressured her to broadcast a false story to protect the broadcaster from having to defend the truth in court, as well as suffer the ire of irate advertisers. Fox argued from the first, and failed on three separate occasions, in front of three different judges, to have the case tossed out on the grounds there is no hard, fast, and written rule against deliberate distortion of the news.

    The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdoch, argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves.”

  14. If the Repubs are smart, they will then nominate for President a non TEA Bagger, more moderate Repub who is both competent and can attract independent

    In other words, we should nominate a RINO. We tried that in 2008 and look where that got us.

  15. Perish the thought of her ever becoming President, by succession or by election – there’s the danger!

    Danger from what? A sudden outbreak of Common Sense all wrapped up in American values? Someone who supports more freedom and less centralized government power, this in keeping with the ideals this country was founded on?

    The only “Danger” here is the danger to left wing ideology. Give Palin eight years, and she might well leave it in the dustbin of history where it belongs.

  16. Yeah, it’s always a good idea to let a historical revisionist; a vitriolic spittle-flecked spewer of hateful slanderous speech such as falsely calling a Governor a dictator or falsely calling a Conservative a terrorist, using sexually explicit terminology to defamatorily label a Conservative movement; a radical left-winger tell Conservatives who they should nominate for President of a center-right nation. //////

    And, Pho, your quote does not say what you claimed FOX said. But you knew that already. You’re just here to troll and to spread misinformation.

  17. And, Pho, your quote does not say what you claimed FOX said.

    You never were much good at reading within context. Pretty blind, JH.

  18. No, Pho, I was never good at twisting words completely out of shape to make them say something completely different and oftentimes opposite of their context, as you do the vast majority of the time, since that is something I never practice.

  19. Because Sarah Palin decided to put a flag on her bus and that’s illegal or something

    As it turns out, Palin can’t even name the Statue of Liberty

    PLEASE nominate her as the GOP candidate…

Comments are closed.