It’s Now Patriotic to Call Paul Krugman a !@%$#%@ Hypocrite

From Le-gal In-sur-rec-tion:

Now I know the real reason for the paywall, to prevent those of us who do not want to feed the beast from getting the evidence to call Paul Krugman what he is, a complete and total phony, a hypocrite of the worst type, a has-been using his Nobel Prize as an excuse to call others names to cover up his lack of evidence.

Thank goodness Paul Krugman has taken off the mask, and it’s now patriotic to call Krugman a !@%$#% hypocrite.

Read the whole thing. Nuff said.

13 Comments

  1. Not at all Nang. We also now have the fact that America’s credit worthiness is in doubt. Only an avowed socialist and a-holes like Krugman could have brought us to this position. But “keep on spendin’” and let’s get those rich guys!

    Krugman’s always been a phoney economist and always will be. He’s a classist, not an economist. Or perhaps he’s the kind of economist that the Soviets employed: keep spouting the socialist line and keep your job. stop and you’ll visit the gulag.

  2. “Krugman’s always been a phoney economist and always will be. He’s a classist, not an economist. Or perhaps he’s the kind of economist that the Soviets employed: keep spouting the socialist line and keep your job. stop and you’ll visit the gulag.”

    Right, because Hoagie John disagrees with Krugman, then Krugman is not an economist. Quite a stretch there John. In fact, your entire comment, with not one example to demonstrate your point, is a candidate for the garbage can, in my view!

  3. Krugman’s an insignificant runt, a communist pimp who’s got his head so far up his ass he couldn’t see daylight at noon. His opinions are nothing but regurgitated Marxist claptrap dressed up in the day’s Democrat Party talking points. His utility resides exclusively in his unwavering ability to misinform his bootlicking leftist acolytes.

  4. Krugman’s always been a phoney economist and always will be.

    Wheer’s your Nobel Prize, ignorant fuckwit?

  5. Krugman’s an insignificant runt, a communist pimp who’s got his head so far up his ass he couldn’t see daylight at noon. His opinions are nothing but regurgitated Marxist claptrap dressed up in the day’s Democrat Party talking points. His utility resides exclusively in his unwavering ability to misinform his bootlicking leftist acolytes.

    Wikipedia:

    “Paul Robin Krugman (pronounced /?kru??m?n/;[3] born February 28, 1953) is an American economist, professor of Economics and International Affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University, Centenary Professor at the London School of Economics, and an op-ed columnist for The New York Times.[4][5] In 2008, Krugman won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for his contributions to New Trade Theory and New Economic Geography.

    According to the Nobel Prize Committee, the prize was given for Krugman’s work explaining the patterns of international trade and the geographic concentration of wealth, by examining the impact of economies of scale and of consumer preferences for diverse goods and services.[6] Krugman is known in academia for his work on international economics (including trade theory, economic geography, and international finance),[7][8] liquidity traps and currency crises. According to the IDEAS/RePEc rankings, he is the fourteenth most widely cited economist in the world today.[9]

    As of 2008[update], Krugman has written 20 books and has published over 200 scholarly articles in professional journals and edited volumes.[10] He has also written more than 750 columns dealing with current economic and political issues for The New York Times. Krugman’s International Economics: Theory and Policy, co-authored with Maurice Obstfeld, is a standard college textbook on international economics. He also writes on political and economic topics for the general public, as well as on topics ranging from income distribution to international economics. Krugman considers himself a liberal, calling one of his books and his The New York Times blog “The Conscience of a Liberal”.[11]“

  6. “Wheer’s your Nobel Prize, ignorant fuckwit?”

    Don’t have one, do you? But I do have a degree in economics, do you? Didn’t think so. But you can quote Wiki all you want. As usual, ignorant kiwi. Just keep quoting someone elses thoughts, never come up with your own. You must be the stupidest person on earth. You amuse me.

  7. Dana, how about a new poll, intervention in Libya is getting a bit long in the tooth.

  8. “Don’t have one, do you? But I do have a degree in economics, do you? Didn’t think so. But you can quote Wiki all you want. As usual, ignorant kiwi. Just keep quoting someone elses thoughts, never come up with your own. You must be the stupidest person on earth. You amuse me.”

    That’s not the way I see it, John. PiaToR brings significant facts to bear on most of our discussions. Oftentimes, instead of debating, some of the Righties on here go directly to the ad hom level. It also doesn’t help when he laces his facts with similar ad homs. Why do we have so much trouble on here sticking to the issues and avoiding the ad homs?

  9. Perry asked, “Why do we have so much trouble on here sticking to the issues and avoiding the ad homs?”

    There are 2 major reasons, and 1 minor one. #1, is that Dana refuses to take out the garbage, one bad apple spoils the blog.

    #2, other commenters who know better, respond to the sick SOB which only provides him additional opportunities to spew his hatred and venom. They try to reason with him and he spits in their faces, and the beat goes on.

    Additionally, weasels like you keep making excuses for him, trying to pretend he’s making a useful contribution here, rather than using the site to defecate in public.

  10. Oh, and Perry, that little weasely stunt you just pulled, that’s not calling out the troll from down under. It’s also not at all accurate. But you knew that already.

Comments are closed.